Virtual Currency and Taxes

Tax Topics

VIEW AS PDF

By Roopa Srikanth, CPA

Virtual currency has tested the U.S. honor-based tax system. Though Congress and the IRS have tried to rein in and make taxpayers more accountable for trading in virtual currency, it is still an area where practitioners lack good guidance.

According to the IRS, virtual currency is a digital representation of value, other than a representation of the U.S. dollar or a foreign currency (“real currency”), that functions as a unit of account, a store of value and a medium of exchange.

In some cases, virtual currency is considered convertible currencies. In a sense, virtual currency has an equivalent value in real currency or acts as a substitute for real currency and is referred to as “convertible” virtual currency. Regardless, the IRS treats virtual currency as property and not the same a fiat currency.

The IRS first issued guidance on virtual currencies in Notice 2014-21. The importance of virtual currency is well noted when filing the individual tax returns on Forms 1040, 1040SR and 1040NR.

The first year in which the IRS requested that taxpayers provide some input on virtual currencies was 2019 and it appeared as a question on Schedule 1. Although it was a mandatory check the box, it was often overlooked if the taxpayer did not have Schedule 1 reportable income or adjustments.

Since then, the question has evolved and on the 2022 tax return, the virtual currency question on page 1 is more specific and captures the taxable transaction with “At any time during 2022, did you: (a) receive (as a reward, award or payment for property or services); or (b) sell, exchange, gift or otherwise dispose of a digital asset (or a financial interest in a digital asset)? All of the changes are meant to make taxpayers consider if there is a reportable transaction and possible taxable event.

It is to be noted that for 2022, the IRS expanded the scope of this question. This not only addresses virtual currency, but other digital assets such as stablecoins and nonfungible tokens (NFTs). These are beyond the scope of this article.

Taxability

As W-2 Income. If an employer pays an employee for services in virtual currency, it is treated as regular wages and is subject to federal, Social Security and Medicare withholding. The income will be the rate of virtual currency on the date of receipt.

Example 1: Assume the coin on the date of receipt of January 2021 wages was trading at $500. The taxpayer was paid 10 coins, so the income would be $5,000. If the taxpayer received another 10 coins in February when it was trading at $400 apiece, the income for that month would be $4,000.

Self-employment Income for Services. Similar to W-2 income, if the payment for any services rendered is paid by virtual currency to a self-employed taxpayer, the income will be subject to self-employment tax. This will be reported as though the taxpayer had received real currency on Schedule C at the value on the date of receipt. These are subject to information reporting on Form 1099-NEC, which should be issued by the payer.

Capital Gains. Since virtual currency is property and not recognized like regular currency, it takes the form of an asset once received either for services or in exchange for goods.

Example 2: Continuing with Example 1, let’s assume that a taxpayer used five of the 10 coins received in January to purchase goods in February. On the date of payment for the goods, the currency was trading at $600, so there is a $100 gain on each coin, resulting in a capital gain of $500. Short-term or long-term capital gains status depends on the holding period. In this example, the basis would be 2,500 and proceeds would be 3,000, and the gain would be considered a short-term gain.

Presently for tax year 2022 reported in 2023, the virtual currency trading platforms are not required to issue 1099-B, but according to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, this will be a requirement for tax year 2023 reported in 2024.

Note: The IRS is currently working on development of Form 1099-DA for reporting for the 2023 tax year. In the meantime, many of the trading platforms will provide a summary of transactions, even if not filed with the IRS, which is a great tool for reporting capital gains.

Ordinary gains. There will be either ordinary gain or loss if a business trades property other than a capital asset in exchange for virtual currency. This will be a difference between the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property in an arm’s length transaction and the FMV of virtual currency.

Example 3: If a business sells its product worth $1,000 and receives three virtual currency units that were trading at $500 apiece, it recognizes ordinary gain of $500. The basis in the virtual currency for future transactions would be $1,500.

Hard Fork/Soft Fork

Hard Fork. If a virtual currency goes through a hard fork, income is recognized only if there is an airdrop. According to the IRS, a hard fork occurs when a cryptocurrency undergoes a protocol change resulting in a permanent diversion from the legacy distributed ledger. This may result in the creation of a new cryptocurrency on a new distributed ledger in addition to the legacy cryptocurrency on the legacy distributed ledger.

In simple terms, a hard fork is when a single cryptocurrency splits in two. This results in an old and new version of cryptocurrency. The new and old version are incompatible, resulting in two different cryptocurrencies.

Cryptocurrencies refers to a part of virtual currency that uses a technology called cryptography to keep the transactions secure and authentic.

Receipt of new cryptocurrency or distribution of some other transfer is called an airdrop. The FMV on the date of receipt will be recognized as ordinary income. This will also be the basis of the new received currency. The receipt date, in the case of hard fork currency, will be the day the taxpayer exercises dominion and control to trade, sell or exchange the currency.

In cases where virtual cash is received in hard fork, the taxable event will be when the virtual cash is received. This is explained in Chief Counsel Advice 202114020 with examples.

Soft Fork. According to the IRS, a soft fork occurs when a distributed ledger undergoes a protocol change that does not result in a diversion of the ledger and thus does not result in the creation of a new cryptocurrency.

In simple terms, soft fork is a split of a single cryptocurrency, where the old and new versions are compatible. The functionality of the currency is improved without creating a new cryptocurrency. Because soft forks do not result in receiving new cryptocurrency, one will be in the same position as they were prior to the soft fork; i.e., the soft fork will not result in any income. If the virtual currency goes through a soft fork, then no income is recognized.

Gift Tax

If the virtual currency is received as a gift, no income is recognized unless it is traded or exchanged. The basis to the donee depends on the gain or loss on sale. If the sale of virtual currency results in a gain, the basis is equal to the donor’s basis plus any gift tax paid by the donor. If the sale of virtual currency results in a loss, the basis is the lesser of the donor’s basis or FMV on the date of the gift. If the donor’s basis is not substantiated, the basis will be zero.

Filing a gift tax return, Form 709, is advisable even if the gift of virtual currency is below the threshold limit of $15,000 (years 2020 and 2021) since it can function as basis documentation for the donee.

The holding period of virtual currency by the donee will include the donor’s holding period. If there is no documentation of the donor’s holding period, the donee’s gift receipt date will start the holding period.

Foreign Reporting

The Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in Notice 2020-2 said it intends to propose the reporting of virtual currency holdings in foreign accounts exceeding $10,000 on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR).

Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, does not specifically address virtual currencies. Conservatively, it is probably a good practice to report virtual currencies held in foreign bank accounts. Following FinCEN’s guidelines, the IRS might issue similar guidelines and regulations.

Charitable Donations

Virtual currency used for charitable donations will be treated as non-cash donations. If the virtual currency was held for more than a year, the donation value will be FMV on the date of payment. If it was held for less than a year, the donation value will be the lesser of the FMV on the date of payment or the receipt date.

Consider a scenario where the taxpayer decides to donate two coins. On the date of donation, it was trading at $600. If held for more than a year, the value of the donation will be $1,200. If held for one year, continuing from Example 1, since on the date of receipt the value was $500, the donation value will only be $1,000. In a recent Chief Counsel Advice 202114020, the IRS held that if a taxpayer makes a charitable contribution of cryptocurrency valued at more than $5,000, a qualified appraisal is required.

Penalties and Assessment

The IRS has been actively taking steps and sending Letters 6173, 6174 and 6174-A, each attempting to address the non-reporting or incorrect reporting of virtual currencies. For example:

  • Letter 6173, the IRS addresses non-reporting of virtual currency on the tax returns filed in the recent years by the taxpayer.
  • Letter 6174 is an advisory letter providing taxability information on virtual currency.
  • Letter 6174-A addresses the issue of not reporting the virtual currency transactions properly on the tax returns.

In all of these letters, the IRS makes it clear that it is aware of the virtual currency account held by the taxpayer. The three notices advise filing amended returns where needed to report or correct the reporting of the virtual currency transactions.

If there are no virtual currency transactions to be reported as a response to Letter 6173, the taxpayer has to sign the letter under penalty of perjury. In the case of Letters 6174 and 6174-A, the IRS warns taxpayers about potential civil and criminal enforcement for non-reporting or incorrect reporting of virtual currency transactions.

Since information reporting forms are to be filed with the IRS for transactions involving virtual currencies from third parties, it is imperative that taxpayers voluntarily and correctly report income to avoid such letters or penalty assessments from the IRS.

With the recent FTX scandal and with many other frauds involving cryptocurrency, there are multiple bills in Congress to regulate cryptocurrency. We can expect the federal government and the IRS to issue more regulations in the near future.

Related CPE

To learn more and register, go to the Education area of TXCPA’s website at tx.cpa and search on cryptocurrencies in “Search Online Learning.”

Resources
Blockchain magazine
Investopedia
IRS Pub 2014-21
www.irs.gov

About the Author: Roopa Srikanth, CPA, is Tax Manager at Carr, Riggs, & Ingram, LLC. She may be contacted at rsrikanth@cricpa.com.

 

  • TXCPA’s 2025 Rising Stars

    TXCPA’s Rising Stars Program honors 16 exceptional CPA members under 40 who are making a significant impact in the profession and their communities. These honorees exemplify leadership, innovation, and a commitment to making a difference.
    View Article
  • CPE: Information Security Plans for Tax Professionals: A Review of Existing Guidance

    This article reviews the essential information security responsibilities of tax professionals and CPA firms amid growing cybersecurity threats. It outlines key IRS and FTC requirements, and offers practical steps for safeguarding taxpayer data, detecting and responding to breaches, and complying with data privacy laws.
    View Article
  • Top 10 Estate Planning Topics in Texas in 2025: A Scholarly Perspective

    This article highlights 10 key issues shaping estate planning in Texas. As a client's needs grow more complex, Texas CPAs play a critical role in guiding them with expertise, foresight and personalized strategies.
    View Article
  • The PCC’s 2025 Priorities: Advising FASB on Private Company Issues

    In 2025, the Private Company Council continued its work advising the Financial Accounting Standards Board on financial reporting issues affecting private companies. PCC Chair Jere Shawver discusses key accomplishments and what's ahead.
    View Article
  • Legislative Wins Reshape CPA Licensure and Mobility in Texas

    TXCPA achieved major legislative wins in the 89th Texas Legislature, including creation of a new CPA licensure pathway and modernizing practice mobility. These victories highlight our leadership in opening new doors for current and future CPAs.
    View Article
  • What’s Happening Around Texas - November-December 2025

    TXCPA chapters across Texas hosted events supporting education, professional growth and community engagement. Highlights include Corpus Christi’s school supply drive, Dallas’s behind-the-scenes Meyerson Symphony Center tour, East Texas’s Leadership Day, and San Antonio’s Beta Alpha Psi Competition and Accounting Educators Mixer.
    View Article
  • IAASB Approves New Standard on Sustainability Assurance

    The IAASB approved ISSA 5000, the first comprehensive global standard for sustainability assurance, effective for periods beginning December 15, 2026. The principles-based standard applies to all ESG topics, introduces the concept of double materiality, and allows for limited or reasonable assurance engagements.
    View Article
  • Our Rising Stars Shine Brightly

    TXCPA Chair Billy Kelley highlights the November/December issue of Today’s CPA, where we celebrate TXCPA’s Rising Stars - emerging leaders shaping the profession’s future. He also discusses the articles on estate planning, sustainability standards, information security, and TXCPA advocacy, plus chapter updates as members close out the year.
    View Article
  • Automation and AI and its Impact on the Future of Accounting

    Automation and artificial intelligence are revolutionizing accounting by streamlining tasks, improving accuracy and enhancing decision making. While offering efficiency and strategic benefits, these technologies also raise challenges around ethics, data privacy and workforce skills.
    View Article
  • PCAOB Adopts New Audit Firm and Engagement-Level Metrics Disclosures

    PCAOB's Release No. 2024-002 introduces new firm-level and engagement-level audit metrics to increase transparency and provide more decision-useful information. While broadly supporting the goal, stakeholders raised concerns about high compliance costs, a limited link to audit quality and potential negative impacts on smaller firms.
    View Article
  • Take Note

    In this edition of Take Note: November is Accounting Opportunities Month and TXCPA Month of Service; Member Insurance Program Provides Exclusive Benefits; Midyear Leadership Council Meeting is January 22-23; Support Through ACAN; TXCPA’s Career Center
    View Article
  • Classifieds

    The classified ad section features listings for practice sales, firm buyers and specialized services. Whether you're expanding, selling or exploring niche opportunities, these ads connect you to valuable prospects and resources.
    View Article

CHAIR
Mohan Kuruvilla, Ph.D., CPA

PRESIDENT/CEO
Jodi Ann Ray, CAE, CCE, IOM

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Melinda Bentley, CAE

EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR
Jennifer Johnson, CPA

MANAGER, MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS
Peggy Foley
pfoley@tx.cpa

MANAGING EDITOR
DeLynn Deakins
ddeakins@tx.cpa

COLUMN EDITOR
Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

DIGITAL MARKETING SPECIALIST
Wayne Hardin, CDMP, PCM®

CLASSIFIEDS
DeLynn Deakins

Texas Society of CPAs
14131 Midway Rd., Suite 850
Addison, TX 75001
972-687-8550
ddeakins@tx.cpa

 

Editorial Board
Derrick Bonyuet-Lee, CPA-Austin;
Aaron Borden, CPA-Dallas;
Don Carpenter, CPA-Central Texas;
Rhonda Fronk, CPA-Houston;
Aaron Harris, CPA-Dallas;
Baria Jaroudi, CPA-Houston;
Elle Kathryn Johnson, CPA-Houston;
Jennifer Johnson, CPA-Dallas;
Lucas LaChance, CPA-Dallas, CIA;
Nicholas Larson, CPA-Fort Worth;
Anne-Marie Lelkes, CPA-Corpus Christi;
Bryan Morgan, Jr, CPA-Austin;
Stephanie Morgan, CPA-East Texas;
Kamala Raghavan, CPA-Houston;
Amber Louise Rourke, CPA-Brazos Valley;
Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy, CPA-Houston, CA
Nikki Lee Shoemaker, CPA-East Texas, CGMA;
Natasha Winn, CPA-Houston.

CONTRIBUTORS
Melinda Bentley; Kenneth Besserman; Kristie Estrada; Holly McCauley; Craig Nauta; Kari Owen; John Ross; Lani Shepherd; April Twaddle; Patty Wyatt