November 10, 2023

Special-Purpose Acquisition Companies Growing More Popular But Present Unique Accounting Issues

The use of special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), also known as blank check companies, has increased exponentially over the past few years. They allow investors to take companies public without the costs and delays associated with traditional IPOs. A SPAC is created to pool investor funds to accomplish a merger or acquisition within a specified period of time. At creation, the acquisition target is generally not known to the investors. Since 2020, more than half of U.S. IPOs have utilized the SPAC structure.

Before we discuss the typical SPAC structure, let’s examine the advantages it offers over the traditional IPO. The SPAC is registered with the SEC and is a publicly traded company. As such, the public can buy its shares; hence the nickname “poor man’s private equity fund.” The SPAC can typically go public in just a few months, shortening the time typically required for a conventional IPO of six months to more than a year. However, it lacks an active business since the acquisition of a target has not been completed.

Given the simplicity of the SPAC balance sheet, preparation for going public is both quicker and less expensive. This is not to say that the costs associated with taking the target company public are avoided fully. Financial information of the target is generally required to be presented to the SPAC investors to receive final approval of the transaction and the target must be “public ready” upon completion of the merger.

A SPAC transaction generally follows a well-established path:

  • Units comprised of Class A shares and some fraction of a warrant are sold to investors for $10 upon the SPAC going public. This will generally compose about 80% of the share capital.
  • The sponsors are awarded founder shares and warrants for a nominal investment to make up the remaining 20% of the share capital.
  • The proceeds are held in trust to be used for the acquisition of a target within a limited time frame; usually less than 24 months.

If the acquisition is not completed within the window, the investors’ shares are redeemed (plus interest) from the funds in trust. However, the sponsors can generally induce the investors to extend the acquisition deadline by making a contribution to the trust fund.

Investors can sell their shares and/or warrants on the secondary market at any time. Sponsors are generally required to retain their shares and warrants.

Once a target is identified and the merger is pending, investors can opt out by demanding redemption of their shares. They can retain the warrants even if the shares are redeemed. For those who participate on the initial offering of the SPAC shares, they are therefore guaranteed the return of their initial investment. Investors buying the shares on the secondary market receive no warrants and pay market price.

The warrants (typically with a strike price of $11.50) generally have a term of five years from the date of the acquisition. The SPAC may call the warrants if their trading price for a period of days (usually 20 -30) exceeds a stated price, which is generally $18. This call feature basically forces holders to exercise the warrants. Sponsor warrants do not include the call feature. The public warrants can only be exercised for cash while the sponsor warrants may be for cash or shares.

Investors should be aware that their shares will typically be diluted. The sponsor shares are awarded without cash investment, which results in dilution of the investor shares of up to 20%. Redemption of Class A shares from investors who opt out prior to the merger can typically run as high as 40 – 50%. Therefore, at merger, only 40% of the share capital may actually be fully cash funded. If the price of the shares rises, the warrants are then likely to be exercised at the $11.50 strike price, further diluting the return of the initial investors.

Recent SEC scrutiny of the warrant accounting has resulted in restatements by several SPACs. Many SPACs had concluded that the warrants should be classified as equity. However, to be classified as equity, the company must evaluate the instrument under a two-step process: (1) the contingent exercise provisions and (2) the settlement options. And it is the latter that has prompted the SEC to disagree with the conclusions of the reporting entities.

To qualify as equity, the settlement must be a “fixed-for-fixed” calculation with the exception that any adjustments are based on standard inputs used to determine the value of “fixed-for-fixed” equity forwards or options. The sponsor options are not redeemable and therefore fail the exception since “type of holder” is not a standard input.

The public warrants often fail the exceptions since the SPAC fails to control the ability to settle with shares. This failure is based on the provision in most SPAC warrant agreements that allows the holders to elect to receive cash in the event of a tender or exchange of the underlaying shares in the context of a change of control.

SPACs failing the exceptions have been required to restate their financials classifying the warrants as derivatives in the liability section of the balance sheet, which requires revaluation at every report date. By the time a restatement is identified, the acquisition of the target has likely been completed, making the restatement an event of note to the investors.

Recently, there has been an increase in the number of SPACs opting to liquidate rather than close acquisitions. Given the complexities of the unique structures of SPACs and the SEC’s accounting treatment evaluation, only time will tell if they remain popular acquisition vehicles.

Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

About the Author: Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA, is clinical professor of accounting at Baylor University. Contact him at Don_Carpenter@baylor.edu.

 

 

 

 

  • The Future of CPA Licensing: TXCPA Members in Action at the State Capitol

    With the profession facing a talent shortage, legislative efforts are underway to introduce alternative pathways to licensure. Additionally, bills have been introduced to address CPA mobility and practicing accounting across state lines. TXCPA members took action at the Texas Capitol to address and emphasize the importance of these initiatives in strengthening the profession.
    View Article
  • CPE: Corporate Codes of Conduct - Similarities and Differences, and Implementation and Communication Strategies

    Codes of conduct serve as essential guidance for organizations, ensuring ethical behavior, regulatory compliance and corporate integrity. This article examines the significance of codes of conduct, highlighting examples from Fortune 500 companies. Effective implementation involves executive endorsement, ongoing communication and integration, and reinforcing accountability.
    View Article
  • Build on Our Momentum

    During TXCPA's 2025 Advocacy Day at the state Capitol, CPA professionals met with legislators to discuss proposed legislation on alternative CPA pathways and mobility. These efforts strengthened relationships with lawmakers, positioning CPAs as trusted advocates for the profession. The positive feedback from legislators reflects the impact of these advocacy efforts.
    View Article
  • Assessing AI From a Tax Perspective, Part 2

    In part 2 of a series, this article examines the risks and limitations of using AI in tax preparation. While AI tools like ChatGPT, Copilot, Perplexity, and TaxGPT can assist with tax research, their accuracy depends on precise prompts and professional oversight. Responses are often outdated, misleading or incorrect, posing risks to professionals who rely on them without verification.
    View Article
  • Understanding Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Standards

    The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) provides industry-specific guidelines for companies to report on ESG factors that impact financial performance. Companies use SASB metrics to enhance investor transparency and manage ESG risks. While SEC regulations on sustainability remain pending, over 3,000 companies worldwide have voluntarily adopted the standards to improve corporate performance.
    View Article
  • What’s Happening Around Texas - March-April 2025

    TXCPA chapters across Texas hosted various events to engage members and support future CPAs. TXCPA Dallas held a Coffee & Connections event, while TXCPA East Texas members inspired students at UT Tyler’s Beta Alpha Psi meeting. TXCPA Fort Worth welcomed new licensees at a luncheon and in San Antonio, members celebrated new iDEAL graduates and elected the 2025-2026 Officers and Directors.
    View Article
  • Navigating Timekeeping Compliance in Government Contracting

    Texas contractors receiving government funding must maintain rigorous accounting practices, particularly in timekeeping and labor distribution, to ensure they are adhering to federal regulations. CPAs and finance professionals play a crucial role in enforcing applicable standards. Mastering timekeeping is essential to help meet federal standards and uphold the integrity of taxpayer-funded projects.
    View Article
  • Spotlight on CPAs: Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy, CPA-Houston, CA

    Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy is an accounting profession leader with experience in both public and industry accounting. In this Spotlight on CPAs article, she discusses the differences in their focus, workload and learning opportunities. She also actively contributes to TXCPA through committee service, valuing collaboration and professional development.
    View Article
  • Do New SEC Disclosure Requirements for Share Repurchases Dilute Their Benefit?

    The SEC introduced new disclosure requirements for share repurchases, aiming to increase transparency. Under the updated rules, companies must now disclose daily repurchase data in quarterly reports. Companies must also disclose whether insiders traded in the four days before or after announcing a buyback. The rules do not specifically address accelerated share repurchase programs.
    View Article
  • Custom Reporting Solutions for ASC 842 Lease Accounting

    ASC 842 compliance remains challenging as organizations manage complex lease portfolios and multiple accounting systems. While standard software offers reporting features, many require custom solutions to integrate specific accounting attributes and enhance internal controls. Using a structured approach to developing custom reports can help improve efficiency and support the decision-making process.
    View Article
  • 2024-2025 Accounting Education Foundation Scholarship Recipients

    The TXCPA Accounting Education Foundation (AEF) awards scholarships to outstanding students, providing not only financial aid but also connections to a supportive community of experienced professionals. Congratulations to these exceptional students for their dedication and commitment to excellence!
    View Article
  • Take Note

    In this edition of Take Note: How to Get the Latest Updates on BOI Reporting; Safeguard What Matters Most; Accountants Confidential Assistance Network; Advocacy Day and Midyear Leadership Council Meeting; TXCPA Career Center; CGMA® Designation
    View Article
  • Classifieds

    The classified ad section features listings for practice owners looking to sell, professionals seeking firms to purchase and a variety of specialized services. Whether you're looking to expand, sell or explore niche opportunities, these classified ads can connect you to valuable business prospects and resources.
    View Article

CHAIR
Mohan Kuruvilla, Ph.D., CPA

PRESIDENT/CEO
Jodi Ann Ray, CAE, CCE, IOM

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Melinda Bentley, CAE

EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR
Jennifer Johnson, CPA

MANAGER, MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS
Peggy Foley
pfoley@tx.cpa

MANAGING EDITOR
DeLynn Deakins
ddeakins@tx.cpa

COLUMN EDITOR
Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

DIGITAL MARKETING SPECIALIST
Wayne Hardin, CDMP, PCM®

CLASSIFIEDS
DeLynn Deakins

Texas Society of CPAs
14131 Midway Rd., Suite 850
Addison, TX 75001
972-687-8550
ddeakins@tx.cpa

 

Editorial Board
Derrick Bonyuet-Lee, CPA-Austin;
Aaron Borden, CPA-Dallas;
Don Carpenter, CPA-Central Texas;
Rhonda Fronk, CPA-Houston;
Aaron Harris, CPA-Dallas;
Baria Jaroudi, CPA-Houston;
Elle Kathryn Johnson, CPA-Houston;
Jennifer Johnson, CPA-Dallas;
Lucas LaChance, CPA-Dallas, CIA;
Nicholas Larson, CPA-Fort Worth;
Anne-Marie Lelkes, CPA-Corpus Christi;
Bryan Morgan, Jr, CPA-Austin;
Stephanie Morgan, CPA-East Texas;
Kamala Raghavan, CPA-Houston;
Amber Louise Rourke, CPA-Brazos Valley;
Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy, CPA-Houston, CA
Nikki Lee Shoemaker, CPA-East Texas, CGMA;
Natasha Winn, CPA-Houston.

CONTRIBUTORS
Melinda Bentley; Kenneth Besserman; Holly McCauley; Craig Nauta; Kari Owen; John Ross; Lani Shepherd; Patty Wyatt

 

Your TXCPA membership has not been renewed for 2025 -2026. Renew now.